Talk:List of LNG terminals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problem

LNG terminals are the end of the chain of LNG, i.e. regasification terminals. But in the list, I notice many liquefaction plants. That bugs me, I think the whole article is therefore not valid.

I agree that this is a problem. I proposed that the article name should be changed to 'List of LNG plants and terminals'. Do you agree? --Robbin' Knowledge (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

See http://www.globallnginfo.com/World%20LNG%20plant%20&%20terminal.pdf for a fuller list —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.16.174 (talk) 18:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't we aim for as complete a list as possible?

Edit by Hu12 on 31 May 2008 removed many of the terminals listed, including various information associated with these. I'm just a beginner on wiki etiquette (like WP:NOT and WP:NOTDIR), so maybe there is some other way that this list should be presented in Wikipedia? Pakaraki (talk) 07:48, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Japan, Korea and Taiwan?

There seems to be no mention here of the 23 regas terminals in Japan, yet Japan accounted for 39% of all LNG imports in 2007. Likewise, no mention of South Korea (15% of global trade) or Taiwan (5%). A more complete list would be more helpful.--Vvmodel (talk) 11:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map

I'm considering to make a svg map, I anyone is aware of one existing under free license, plz say it (i hate working uselessly) --Raminagrobis fr (talk) 22:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 40 external links on List of LNG terminals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Spanish LNG terminals

According to https://www.export.gov/apex/article2?id=Spain-energy "Spain regasification capacity counts for 40 percent of the total LNG regasification capacity in the EU."--So9q (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]